Seth Godin and the Future of Books

August 23rd, 2010

The big buzz in book circles this morning is that Seth Godin, author of Linchpin and 11 other books, is retiring. Well, not exactly. He’s retiring from writing books in the format we know — that is, in hardcover, with a price point north of $20, available in bookstores like Borders, showing up there at least 6 months after he completes the manuscript. As he wrote in his “Moving On” post, traditional publishers use an “antique and expensive distribution system,” and wind up “adding layers or faux scarcity.” The majority of Seth’s blog readers have never bought one of his books, and he has tired of pondering how to get people to go to a store they don’t usually visit and buy something they don’t usually purchase, when all he wants to do is spread ideas.

And so, as he wrote, “It’s been years since I woke up in the morning saying, ‘I need to write a book, I wonder what it should be about.’”

I almost choked reading that, because this is exactly what I woke up this morning thinking. 168 Hours (which Seth graciously blurbed) came out in late May, and now it’s time to come up with the next book idea. Not just because I’d like another advance, and not just because I want to say something. I write lots of articles and blog posts, and those are great fun, but I really like writing books.

Seth’s announcement has me trying to put my finger on why. Books are extraordinarily inefficient. I have spent several years working on 168 Hours in some form, and yet fewer people have read that than read my USA Today op-ed on lawns which ran last week (which, incidentally, got mentioned in the print version of Time on the Verbatim page – very exciting). I know many people have heard of 168 Hours — say, the several million who watched my Today Show appearance in June. But looking at my sales numbers, millions of viewers translated into roughly an extra 500 copies beyond the normal burn rate. While people may pay $26 for a sweater without thinking about it, paying $26 for something that then requires you to think and invest several hours in its consumption is a tough sell.

But… Here’s what I love about writing books, at least in theory. I love the length of them. I love delving into a topic deeply, for far more words than someone will tolerate on a machine that also lets them check their email. I like having the time to polish my prose (sometimes; I did once ghost write a book in 6 weeks). There is a certain word-made-flesh satisfaction in having ideas formed into a physical product, a physical product which then goes places that are separate from my desk. I love reading books for many of the same reasons — being able to inhabit another writer’s head for many hours and taking in a long story that goes where a blog post can’t. If a book is important enough to me (ones like Annie Dillard’s Pilgrim at Tinker Creek — such an example of prose done as craft!) I want to see it, embodied. If you think about it, this is the same reason we give gifts, rather than just telling a host “thank you.” Ideas feel more important when we give them a physical form.

Of course, I know all of this is not entirely rational. I love my Kindle and its ability to get me my books instantly. I also know that the book industry is suffering, perhaps for not setting itself apart enough. I get review copies of at least a dozen books a month, and many don’t contain an idea that’s big enough to justify a magazine story, let alone hundreds of pages, and the writing craft has been shoved to the bottom of the priority list, way below some version of platform. Or the fact that a person who has been on television was involved. The time lag between when a writer finishes a manuscript and the book comes out is crazy in a world where H&M can stock their stores with fashions inside weeks of design. And I’ll just note a rumor that some publishers (not Portfolio) still have authors make changes on their galleys in colored pencils, like we’re hanging out with Gutenberg himself.

Still, I hope books will remain part of the mix in the marketplace of ideas. Seth writes that “my mission is to figure out who the audience is, and take them where they want and need to go, in whatever format works, even if it’s not a traditionally published book.” It may not be. But I think books are still a pretty good way of doing this — or at least are easier to wrap as a Christmas present than a blog post.

Core Competencies, the Happiness Project, computer woes, and being me

August 22nd, 2010

After meeting Gretchen Rubin at the BlogHer conference two weeks ago, I reread The Happiness Project. One of her themes in the book is remembering to “Be Gretchen,” that is, accepting her quirks rather than dwelling on them. While going to a jazz club at midnight sounds appealing in theory, she knows she will never really enjoy it. Happiness comes from knowing ourselves.

In 168 Hours, I talk about “core competencies,” which touches on a similar idea. These are things we do best that other people cannot do nearly as well. While this frames the issue positively, recognizing that we maybe have half a dozen core competencies suggests a corollary — namely, that there are many things we don’t do well. You can spend tons of time trying to improve on these things, or you can just admit you don’t like them and then ignore, minimize or outsource them. Not only will this make you happier, it may save you time. Even if it doesn’t seem to.

Creating nice, organized systems for things falls into the “ignore” category for me, even though everyone tells me how much time being organized will save. I don’t organize papers on my desk. I don’t file my emails. And I don’t have any good system for backing up my files. Oh, I know I should in theory. But I don’t. I email myself the word documents or the occasional picture I believe I should keep for posterity, but perhaps I don’t harbor the illusion that everything I create should be saved.

Which is good, because now it isn’t. I’m typing this blog post on my new MacBook Pro (my little brother convinced me to buy it. He also convinced me to buy an iPhone — is Steve Jobs paying him or what?) My Panasonic Toughbook pretty much died yesterday morning. The machine had been ailing for the past few months so I knew it was coming, but nonetheless, a computer’s death always seems to catch you by surprise. I have fond memories of that little 3-pounder. It saw all the platform-building articles I wrote before I got the contract for 168 Hours. I wrote the book on it, and many articles and musings I rather enjoyed.

Now I’m not sure what files I have and what I don’t. Perhaps I’ll spend some time this week figuring it out. Or not. I’m actually surprised how calm I am about it. I’m starting to feel that way about my messy house as well. I could spend a lot of time organizing it, and then get upset when the tornado that is my kids destroys it again and again. Or I can just accept that while a neat house is as nice as a jazz club in theory, it’s just not going to happen for me. Better to Be Laura — focused on my next project rather than preserving the last one.

10 ways to embrace the evening hours with little kids

August 20th, 2010

(cross-posted at Gifted Exchange)

My kids are night owls. While I console myself that needing less sleep is often a sign of giftedness, it’s hard on a parent to have a 3-year-old who really will not go to sleep until 10PM (the baby often doesn’t go down until 9PM or later, either).

The net result is that we have some long evenings in our house. While there are some perks to this as a working parent — even working 50 hour weeks I can usually spend 5-6 hours per workday with my kids — there are also some downsides. What do we do with that time? Dinner and baths certainly don’t take 3-4 hours. In summer we can go to the park, but it gets dark here by 8, and in winter it’s dark at 4:45PM. New York has many wonderful activities for children on weekends and during the weekdays, but there are not a whole lot of activities for 3- and 1-year-olds that start at, say, 7PM.

So, over the last 3 years, I have slowly been building a list of evening activities that will distract the kids from whining for Dora for at least a little while. Some of them:

1. Borders! Last night we camped out in the kids’ section for 45 minutes playing with the plastic dinosaurs. While this is not really a free activity (I usually wind up buying sticker books), a library with evening hours would serve the same purpose.

2.   The grocery store. But not necessarily with the purpose of buying groceries. I try to order the workhorse staples of my grocery list online, since the kids get cranky after a short while of shopping, and hauling groceries (I don’t have a car) while hauling the kids is tough. So if I go with both kids, we cruise the produce aisle and name things and then buy, like, one bunch of bananas.

3. A run with the double stroller. Lock the front wheel, cruise 1.5 miles to a playground, play briefly (or not, depending on how dark it’s getting), run home. A bonus way to get more exercise.

4. Visit the play room or pool. My apartment building has a kids’ playroom and an indoor pool, both of which are technically open until 9:45PM on weeknights. Yes, people think you’re crazy when they see your small children up at 8PM, but so it goes.

5. Museums with evening hours. I have to plan ahead for this, as often they close by 6PM. But some stay open late one night per week.

6. Evening playdates. This hasn’t worked out quite as often as I would have liked (since other people’s children seem not to keep my kids’ hours) but is a great option if you can pull it off.

7. Invite people who don’t have kids over for dinner. This has several benefits. First, you get to see them without the whole babysitter song and dance. Second, the kids enjoy hanging out with other adults who may be a bit less burned out than the parents. Order take-out so no one has to cook.

8. Backyard “camping.” OK, living in the heart of New York City, this one isn’t an option for me, but I look forward to someday doing evening campfires and s’mores, even if the fire is inside the grill on the patio.

9. Really easy arts and crafts. You know the Crate & Barrel and Harry & David catalogs that show up, oh, every other day? Make collages.

10. Random sporting events. Jasper and I have been known to go take in a kickball game in Central Park. Interesting to watch for a bit, but if you don’t really care about the team or the sport, than you won’t mind leaving in the middle (key with kids).

Of course, many of these things require at least a bit of planning. As I’ve been pondering how I spend my hours, I realize that I don’t plan for the evenings as often as I should. I’m tired after working all day, and I’m tempted to play it safe, staying home rather than risking a subway diaper explosion or a meltdown. But given how long our evenings can be, staying home the whole time without something on the agenda is a recipe for frayed nerves, or for constant begging to play “stegasaurus,” which involves crawling around on the floor and hurts my knees. Or for a Dora the Explorer marathon. And while Dora is fine for half an hour, 3-4 hours is a bit much.

I’d really welcome other suggestions on things to do during the evening hours with kids who don’t sleep.

168 Hours on Voice America Network, 6pm Eastern

August 18th, 2010

Will you still be at your desk at 6pm? Or else hanging around the house with a computer handy? Commuting on a train with a set of headphones? Then tune in at 6pm Eastern (3pm Pacific) to listen to my hour-long radio interview with Allen Cardoza’s “Answers for the Family.” During that hour, you can listen to the program by clicking on this link.

You can ask a question by calling 1-866-472-5788, or by emailing answers4thefamily@gmail.com. Please join me as I talk about how we can all manage our time better during this hectic back-t0-school season!

Out of Fashion: Green Lawns

August 17th, 2010

(This is my column from today’s USA Today. Maintaining green, closely-cropped lawns in the middle of summer is a waste of our 168 hours. Someone once compared the ideal lawn to a male corset. You spend hours each week working on it, just for an unnatural fashion….)

By Laura Vanderkam
Diane Faulkner’s lawn was always causing her trouble. This Jacksonville, Fla., resident traveled frequently, and in her absence, her thirsty, fussy grass would go brown or otherwise run afoul of her neighborhood association’s rules. She hated returning home to a $50 fine, but the last straw was when her travels took her to rural Kenya. Immersed in local life, she’d wake up at dawn with the villagers to walk miles along a dried-up river toward a water source, then return with a few gallons for cooking and washing.

“That was their whole morning,” she says. As soon as she got on the plane back to America, she had a thought: “How many gallons of water do I waste on that stinking lawn?” And more broadly, why did she even have a lawn in the first place?

It’s a question a growing number of sweaty Americans are asking as they push (or ride) their lawnmowers in the August heat. While a field of green, closely cropped grass is the default landscape for a “nice” neighborhood, there’s no reason it has to be. And there are plenty of reasons it shouldn’t be — at least if we value the planet and our time.

21 million acres

Historians aren’t exactly sure why lawns became as closely tied to the American dream as homeownership itself. Perhaps early suburban sorts wished to mimic the look of British castle grounds (minus the sheep that were responsible for the close cropping). The fad spread, the lawn care industry grew, and now 21 million acres of the USA are covered with grasses that wouldn’t grow well here if left to their own devices.

The fight to maintain this unnatural state exacts a toll. “It’s essentially like pushing a boulder up a hill,” notes Ted Steinberg, an environmental historian at Case Western Reserve University and author of American Green: The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn.

According to Stephen Kress of the National Audubon Society, homeowners apply 78 million pounds of pesticides a year to lawns, often to kill “weeds” such as dandelions and clover, perhaps not noticing that these plants look just as green as grass when you mow them.

Mowing itself requires fuel, just like our cars, with a similar impact on the environment. And all these woes are before you even get to the issue of water. According to Kress, maintaining non-native plants requires 10,000 gallons of water per year per lawn, over and above rainwater. That water doesn’t just show up by itself; it requires energy to get to your hose. In California, for example, the energy required to treat and move water amounts to 19% of total electricity use in the state.

In short, lawns are incredibly inefficient, and not just from an environmental perspective. Maintenance requires time and money, which people usually claim are in short supply. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ American Time Use Survey, the average father of school-aged kids spends 1.6 hours a week on lawn and garden care — more time than he spends on reading, talking, playing or doing educational activities with his kids combined.

Shaming away a trend

For all these reasons, there’s a growing backlash against suburban seas of green. “The perfect lawn is in peril,” reports Steinberg. Big chunks of Canada have banned certain lawn pesticides. In the U.S., municipalities such as Los Angeles and Raleigh, N.C., regulate how many times a week homeowners can turn on the sprinklers.

That said, while rationing water during droughts has merit, I don’t think policymakers should start regulating lawns broadly. Deploying inspectors to count the square footage of grass vs. wild plants is a waste of resources when states are cutting teachers and cops. The best approach is for all of us to start thinking of lawns as a fashion — a fashion like wearing the feathers of rare birds in hats was once a fashion. Fashions can change when enough people decide they are ridiculous or wasteful. Few parents would light a cigarette at a playground anymore, even if it’s not illegal, and we should start treating the presence of a vast, green, cropped grass lawn in the middle of summer the same way: as a weird and antisocial thing.

Certainly, there are options.

“You don’t have to trade off the lawn for some hideous alternative,” notes Penny Lewis, executive director of the Ecological Landscaping Association. First, ask “how much lawn do you have and how much do you really need?”

Some homeowners keep a small patch of grass around the house and turn parts of the lawn into a meadow that attracts birds and butterflies. Others simply swear off pesticides and let the grass go dormant in the summer.

Faulkner, on the other hand, went all-in. She redid her lawn with rocks and hearty plants such as Confederate Jasmine, arranged to look like an English garden. Because all her plants grow well in Florida, they require no upkeep. “I don’t have to mow, I don’t have to water, I don’t have to trim,” she reports. Her water bill has gone from $80-$90/month to $20.

Her only lawn headache now? Figuring out what to do with the time and money she’s saving — a problem let’s hope more homeowners have soon.

Laura Vanderkam, author of 168 Hours: You Have More Time Than You Think, is a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributors.

70 Things To Do Before Having Kids… Really?

August 16th, 2010

I’m newly back from vacation, and as I ricochet around various social media sites, I came across one recommendation to a site called Marc and Angel Hack Life. Among the articles this couple offers is “70 Things To Do Before Having Kids.” (It’s from about two years back – but was among the top links).

The main idea is sound — namely, that children add a certain complexity to life. And so, Marc and Angel listed 70 goals they wanted to accomplish before having kids.

But whether they have children now or not (and I generally think it’s a great blog), I hope they eventually realize this: people tend to turn children and life into a false choice. In particular, as a new mom, I was alarmed by all the literature claiming it was just so hard to build a career and raise a family at the same time. Yet I never would have written 168 Hours if I hadn’t had Jasper, and now this book is opening new doors to me. Which means that — by the transitive property — my baby opened professional doors for me, rather than closing them. I had more free time before I had children, and yet I never ran a marathon then. I ran my first one this year.

So it’s interesting to me that publishing a book and running a marathon both landed on the 70 Things list. So, incidentally, did going to Munich (I took my toddler along!), living in a high rise condo with an amazing view, perhaps in the heart of New York City (here I am!), and traveling in back roads in a developing country to see what poverty really looks like (I’ve walked through slums in India and Peru since becoming a mom – which I think is more intense than driving in them). I’ve even read 30 books in the last 3 years. Many of the others (like jumping out of an airplane or learning to fly one) have never been on my bucket list and never will be. Kids or not.

The point is, life does not have to end when you have children. Even longer-term, ambitious and personal pursuits do not have to end. You may have to plan more, but planning is a great way to ensure that things get done.

The Giving Pledge

August 16th, 2010

I’ve been reading a lot lately about the Giving Pledge — Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet’s campaign to get other billionaires to pledge at least half their fortunes to charity.

I am of two minds on this. On one hand, I think people can spend their money however they want, and there is a lot of innovative work going on in philanthropy right now. The Gates Foundation is transforming the playing field in global health and vaccines, and hopefully someday will do so more effectively in education than the misguided small schools initiative the foundation had been championing. The Broad Foundation is also doing good work in education.

But I wish we could broaden the definition of charity a bit. You don’t have to be giving money away with no possibility of financial return to be doing good for the world. Indeed, you might do plenty of good by aiming to get a return. I’ve always loved the adage that the best social program is a job. The non-profits these billionaires are pledging to fund create jobs, but so do for-profit companies. When billionaires invest or loan money to start-ups, they are creating jobs. New companies are responsible for the majority of job creation in the American economy. As people land these new jobs, they spend their paychecks on housing and furniture and cars and clothes and gadgets and everything else, thus stimulating demand, which in turn leads to more companies employing more people.

In other words, such investing creates benefits for society. Of course, it tends to also create benefits for the investor, but so what? Perhaps there could be some sort of hybrid of the two, with charity-minded wealthy investors putting money into slightly riskier ventures than they otherwise might, or showing a bias toward ventures that employ more people rather than fewer. But just because something is called “charity” doesn’t mean it’s inherently more worthy than the other activities people do. There are many ways to give back.

BlogHer and the Beach

August 12th, 2010

I just did a post about falling off the wagon with running, and here I am falling off the wagon with blogging as well! I’m actually on vacation this 168 hours with my extended family on the Jersey shore, and have been enjoying a bit of down time. Well, sort of down time. With a 3-year-old and an almost 1-year-old, there’s not a lot of total relaxation, but hey.

Anyway, this post will be a recap of the past week’s 168 Hours news. On Friday and Saturday, I attended the BlogHer conference in New York. Per my previous post, did I take the swag? Not much. I took a toothbrush and a Mrs. Potato-Head toy. I got rid of most of the swag that came in my conference bag, and it felt very freeing to walk around the exhibition hall knowing that I really didn’t intend to take anything.

I did, however, meet a lot of great people, including those whose online monikers I know, like The Mama Bee. I met up with the founders of Executive Moms, the Drinking Diaries, and also Gretchen Rubin, author of The Happiness Project. While she and I were talking, we met up with Erica Noonan, a Boston Globe reporter. Because of that encounter, we wound up being the subject of the Globe’s BlogHer coverage, “The Happiness Project (In 168 Hours).” It was a very flattering piece. Now I need to go through all the business cards I collected and start touching base with people. Conferences can be a bit overwhelming, and I am slowly learning to handle them better — just going up to a table and introducing myself, for instance.

After that, it was off to the beach, briefly, before I went back to New York to speak to the Savor the Success network. This group of women entrepreneurs has chosen 168 Hours as their book club selection. I got to meet about 40 New York-based folks at the speech, and will meet with more by phone in another month. If you’re interested in networking with other business owners, please check out the organization. They do good work.

And now I am back in New Jersey, enjoying some time getting very sandy. Sometimes it’s hard to fathom just how much sand a wet child can attract, but suffice to say, the hose is getting a work-out. I’ll be back posting again more regularly next week.

Falling off the wagon

August 4th, 2010

Canadian Business ran a great review by Jordan Timm of 168 Hours recently. The reviewer, like many people, was taken with the story of Theresa Daytner, the book club-attending, business-running mom of 6 that I profiled in Chapter 1.  While her story is great, I think the best take-away I got from her is to change my language. Rather than say “I don’t have time,” I try to say “It’s not a priority.”

Which is what leads me to the sorry state of my running program at the moment. In the course of writing 168 Hours, I identified running as one of the few activities I wished to focus my energy on (my family, writing, and managing my choir were the others). So I set an ambitious goal — to run my first marathon — and did that in Big Sur in April. I was convinced that having gotten my mind around the idea of distance, I would be making 10-milers and track work a regular part of my life.

Or not. I keep a running log, and in the entire month of July, I ran just shy of 50 miles. The longest I did in any one run was 5 miles, and I only did that once.

I have been trying to figure out what happened. It would be easy enough to say “I don’t have time.” I have excuses. I have two little kids, including a still-nursing baby! (Though one might point out that I had the two little kids when I ran the marathon, and since I started training when the baby was 4 months old, he was spending more time nursing then). I’ve been doing a lot of book promotion activities on top of my usual writing load (see my Fiscal Times debut today, Jobs and Small Business: Three Tips to Improve the Economic Landscape).

And it’s really hot out. (Though while training for the marathon, I actually did a 10-miler in the snow).

Anyway, I have excuses. But I know that it’s all just that — excuses. The truth is, distance running and speed work are not big priorities in my life right now. If I wanted to go for 3-hour runs, I could hire more childcare, wake up earlier, spend less time with my family on weekends, or work less. None of which I want to do at the moment. So I am trying to be honest with myself and admit that right now, I’m only running to maintain a base fitness level, doing 40 minute runs 3-4 times a week. At some other point in my life, like when I sign up for another race, this will change. But that’s not a matter of lacking time.

Does anyone else have something that’s a priority in your life that you’ve consciously scaled back for a while?

What do 168 Hours and The Jersey Shore have in common?

August 3rd, 2010

We’re both hot topics of conversation in Miami, apparently! (I will admit that I spent 45 minutes of my last 168 hours watching the season premiere of Jersey Shore — the episode when they go to Miami. Yikes).

Anyway, the Miami Herald Business Book Club selected 168 Hours for review a few weeks ago. The paper ran Richard Pachter’s kind and thoughtful review yesterday, along with oodles of reader reviews, both in the paper and online. You can read them here.

Some of my favorites? Well, there’s this one from Barry Faske:

I expected no more than a re-wording of other time management books’ insights. What I got was a refreshing personalized account of taking control of your time.

Anne Bloom offers this take:

This book has changed my life! Actually, it calmed me down. It’s okay that I don’t empty my e-mail inbox, and use the search function to find things — so does she! It’s much easier to fit something into a week than into 24 hours.

I seem to have won over recalcitrant reader Amy de la Cruz-Munoz:

I was very prepared to dislike this author when I began this book. In fact, I was ready to smack her after the first chapter about all she had accomplished at the end of just one day. Surprisingly, I not only found it an enjoyable, quick read, but I felt that it gave me quite a bit to think about.

Alex R. Camacho puts me in some very esteemed company:

This book is one that I will add to my “shelf’” of quick reference books that I have on my office desk… right next to Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People, Stephen Covey’s The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People and Og Mandino’s The Choice. This book is a must read for anyone who truly is seeking a fresh prospective on how to tackle century old question: “How do I balance my work life with my personal life?”

Nancy Taylor endorses my housekeeping standards:

Although I am not ready to send out my laundry for others to see my dirty underwear (I believe in literally not sharing your dirty laundry), I do believe there is wisdom in living in planned chaos. Prioritizing a spotless house will only cause me additional guilt, piled on after being a working mother (and secretly enjoying my job, like the author does). I’ve named my dust bunnies.

And Kim Waller gained new insight into her mother’s life:

Until now, I have always wondered how my mother was able to raise 5 kids, in an immaculate house and yard, keep my dad together and help him in his businesses, run 5 miles a day, play tennis, have dinner on the table, have time to watch TV and be in bed by 10:00. Whew, Vanderkam actually tells us how this can be done.

Though some of the reviews were more mixed (or negative), on the whole, I really felt like a lot of the readers “got” the book. It’s not about cramming more in, or about feeling bad about watching TV. It’s about recognizing that we are in charge of our lives, and by choosing how we spend the currency of our time, we can turn the lives we have into the lives we want.