Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

On Labor Day, let’s celebrate the job creators

Friday, September 3rd, 2010

The economy may or may not be recovering, and who knows the shape of said recovery (an L? A W? It appears not to be a straight V, alas). But as the unemployment news hits the wires this AM (9.6%, per the 8:30AM announcement), one thing we do know for sure is that there are a lot fewer people working right now than would like to be working.

I’ve been thinking about these numbers in light of this year’s celebration of Labor Day. According to the Department of Labor, the holiday is intended to celebrate the “social and economic achievements of American workers.” Which have, of course, been many. But most American workers don’t achieve great economic things until someone else creates a job. Who, exactly, is doing that?

In the minds of many (and I would be including our president in this sentence, despite some nice words to the contrary), we often think of job creation as some nebulous corporate decision. And so there is much urging of these nebulous powers that be to create jobs, even as levels of government and various do-gooders try to insert their claws into these decisions. They perceive this as some vast leveling of the playing field between huge corporations and individuals. And so you get health care reform. Reams of paperwork. Fees (it’s hard to claim states actually want us to create jobs when any new hire immediately incurs a workman’s comp and disability premium). Taxes — don’t pretend that payroll taxes don’t raise the costs of hiring people; all the increased unemployment insurance payments are going to have to be made up somehow. And campaigns to guarantee various work-life balance goodies. Most small business owners already wind up covering for their employees when they need to take off for illness, emergencies, etc. Even if that wrecks the business owner’s own work-life balance. But that doesn’t stop the campaigns for demonizing evil employers.

The crazy thing is, though, that these employers are not impersonal. The Kauffman Foundation finds that most new jobs are created by start-ups. These are people who make a decision to solve a problem in the marketplace. They often take on debt. They take on reams of paperwork. They take on oodles of regulations dreamed up by politicians who’ve never personally created a job in their lives. And yes, they hope to make money. But as they do, they create opportunities for other people.

All of this is hard work. It is easier not to do it. In a place like New York, where sometimes the city takes it upon itself to do crazy things like regulate how many words you can have on your store awning, I’m surprised that more business owners don’t make like Atlas, as the saying goes, and shrug. But many keep plugging away. For that, they deserve to be celebrated. This Labor Day, if politicians want more Americans to be involved in labor, then we should be celebrating the job creators. We need more people like them.

List of 100 Dreams: Moving to NYC

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

Every year on Sept 2 I celebrate my “New York anniversary.” When I was younger and living in Indiana, moving to NYC would have been on my List of 100 Dreams (if I’d made an official one). On Sept. 2, 2002 I actually did it. Not because I had a job here. I didn’t, a fact which was mildly alarming to me. I moved because I wanted to live in New York, and for the past eight years, it’s been a great ride, a great reminder that one can write the story of one’s own life.

However, this will probably be my last New York anniversary celebrated in New York. Sometimes you do start wanting more privacy and space, and a lower cost of living, or at least the ability to send your kid to kindergarten without it being like applying to college all over again. And as people point out, you don’t actually go to the Met that often. Which is why I laughed out loud when someone sent me this link to an Onion article called 8.4 Million New Yorkers Suddenly Realize New York City A Horrible Place To Live. On my New York anniversary! Now, if I could just figure out where we want to live instead…

Webinar and 168 Hours Challenge

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

If you’re just visiting the site (either coming from AOL or the Savor chat) welcome! The 168 Hours Challenge, in which we all log our time together, will be from Sept 13-19. More info as that gets closer. You can also register for the 168 Hours time management webinar, “Go Back to School Without Going Back to Crazy” here. Looking forward to seeing you there!

Free Back-To-School Webinar Sept 8!

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

I am happy to announce that I’ll be doing a back-t0-school webinar on September 8, co-hosted by Katherine Reynolds Lewis of CurrentMom. The topic? Go back to school without the back to crazy! Some simple time management strategies can help make this the best school year ever. Join us at 12:30PM eastern on Sept 8 to discuss

  • where the time really goes
  • how to decide, as a family, what deserves your time and attention
  • how to fill bits of time with bits of joy
  • how to get everything else off your plate.

Space is limited! Reserve a spot by following this link. When you sign up, GoToMeeting will send you instructions on how to join the webinar from 12:30-1:30PM on Wednesday, Sept. 8. Basically, you just need a computer to watch the PowerPoint, and either a phone or your computer’s speakers to listen to the discussion and join in. By popular demand, I’ll also be doing another 168 Hours Challenge (where we all log our time) later in September, and will have more details about that at the webinar as well. So please tune in — I’m looking forward to this one.

Hey, what happened to the comments?

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Oh, this blogging thing is tricky. One of the great parts of writing a blog is the opportunity to get instant feedback from readers. Whether people agree with the material here on My168Hours or not, I love to engage with people who want to talk about these ideas.

Unfortunately, a reasonable number of people leaving comments were not here to talk about how we spend our time. They were here to sell cheap Rolex watches or Coach bags, provide links to various porn sites, or hawk other wares. We had a certain level of security, but when you have a real person typing these comments — even if it’s a real person in a spam factory in China — it’s impossible to stop on the front end. So I needed to approve all comments, but for whatever reason, My168Hours.com has been absolutely slammed in the past 2 months. I was getting more than 100 fake comments a day.

The problem? 3-5 were real. So I couldn’t just mass delete. I had to wade through all 100 spam comments to approve the real ones. Let’s just say this was not a great way to spend my 168 hours. So my webmaster has put a stricter level of security on this website, and now you need to have a WordPress account to comment.

In general, I like WordPress, so please do open an account! Of course, that’s not the only way to offer feedback. I encourage you to friend me on Facebook or become a fan of 168 Hours. All my posts are there as well where, in the curated internet, the spam is under control. You can follow me on Twitter (@lvanderkam) and we can continue the conversation there. Or just email me at lvanderkam at yahoo dot com. I really wish there was a better way to do this, and clearly some blogs have figured it out, but until I do, this is the way it will be. On the positive side, my inbox is more manageable these days!

Core Competencies, the Happiness Project, computer woes, and being me

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

After meeting Gretchen Rubin at the BlogHer conference two weeks ago, I reread The Happiness Project. One of her themes in the book is remembering to “Be Gretchen,” that is, accepting her quirks rather than dwelling on them. While going to a jazz club at midnight sounds appealing in theory, she knows she will never really enjoy it. Happiness comes from knowing ourselves.

In 168 Hours, I talk about “core competencies,” which touches on a similar idea. These are things we do best that other people cannot do nearly as well. While this frames the issue positively, recognizing that we maybe have half a dozen core competencies suggests a corollary — namely, that there are many things we don’t do well. You can spend tons of time trying to improve on these things, or you can just admit you don’t like them and then ignore, minimize or outsource them. Not only will this make you happier, it may save you time. Even if it doesn’t seem to.

Creating nice, organized systems for things falls into the “ignore” category for me, even though everyone tells me how much time being organized will save. I don’t organize papers on my desk. I don’t file my emails. And I don’t have any good system for backing up my files. Oh, I know I should in theory. But I don’t. I email myself the word documents or the occasional picture I believe I should keep for posterity, but perhaps I don’t harbor the illusion that everything I create should be saved.

Which is good, because now it isn’t. I’m typing this blog post on my new MacBook Pro (my little brother convinced me to buy it. He also convinced me to buy an iPhone — is Steve Jobs paying him or what?) My Panasonic Toughbook pretty much died yesterday morning. The machine had been ailing for the past few months so I knew it was coming, but nonetheless, a computer’s death always seems to catch you by surprise. I have fond memories of that little 3-pounder. It saw all the platform-building articles I wrote before I got the contract for 168 Hours. I wrote the book on it, and many articles and musings I rather enjoyed.

Now I’m not sure what files I have and what I don’t. Perhaps I’ll spend some time this week figuring it out. Or not. I’m actually surprised how calm I am about it. I’m starting to feel that way about my messy house as well. I could spend a lot of time organizing it, and then get upset when the tornado that is my kids destroys it again and again. Or I can just accept that while a neat house is as nice as a jazz club in theory, it’s just not going to happen for me. Better to Be Laura — focused on my next project rather than preserving the last one.

168 Hours on Voice America Network, 6pm Eastern

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

Will you still be at your desk at 6pm? Or else hanging around the house with a computer handy? Commuting on a train with a set of headphones? Then tune in at 6pm Eastern (3pm Pacific) to listen to my hour-long radio interview with Allen Cardoza’s “Answers for the Family.” During that hour, you can listen to the program by clicking on this link.

You can ask a question by calling 1-866-472-5788, or by emailing answers4thefamily@gmail.com. Please join me as I talk about how we can all manage our time better during this hectic back-t0-school season!

Out of Fashion: Green Lawns

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

(This is my column from today’s USA Today. Maintaining green, closely-cropped lawns in the middle of summer is a waste of our 168 hours. Someone once compared the ideal lawn to a male corset. You spend hours each week working on it, just for an unnatural fashion….)

By Laura Vanderkam
Diane Faulkner’s lawn was always causing her trouble. This Jacksonville, Fla., resident traveled frequently, and in her absence, her thirsty, fussy grass would go brown or otherwise run afoul of her neighborhood association’s rules. She hated returning home to a $50 fine, but the last straw was when her travels took her to rural Kenya. Immersed in local life, she’d wake up at dawn with the villagers to walk miles along a dried-up river toward a water source, then return with a few gallons for cooking and washing.

“That was their whole morning,” she says. As soon as she got on the plane back to America, she had a thought: “How many gallons of water do I waste on that stinking lawn?” And more broadly, why did she even have a lawn in the first place?

It’s a question a growing number of sweaty Americans are asking as they push (or ride) their lawnmowers in the August heat. While a field of green, closely cropped grass is the default landscape for a “nice” neighborhood, there’s no reason it has to be. And there are plenty of reasons it shouldn’t be — at least if we value the planet and our time.

21 million acres

Historians aren’t exactly sure why lawns became as closely tied to the American dream as homeownership itself. Perhaps early suburban sorts wished to mimic the look of British castle grounds (minus the sheep that were responsible for the close cropping). The fad spread, the lawn care industry grew, and now 21 million acres of the USA are covered with grasses that wouldn’t grow well here if left to their own devices.

The fight to maintain this unnatural state exacts a toll. “It’s essentially like pushing a boulder up a hill,” notes Ted Steinberg, an environmental historian at Case Western Reserve University and author of American Green: The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn.

According to Stephen Kress of the National Audubon Society, homeowners apply 78 million pounds of pesticides a year to lawns, often to kill “weeds” such as dandelions and clover, perhaps not noticing that these plants look just as green as grass when you mow them.

Mowing itself requires fuel, just like our cars, with a similar impact on the environment. And all these woes are before you even get to the issue of water. According to Kress, maintaining non-native plants requires 10,000 gallons of water per year per lawn, over and above rainwater. That water doesn’t just show up by itself; it requires energy to get to your hose. In California, for example, the energy required to treat and move water amounts to 19% of total electricity use in the state.

In short, lawns are incredibly inefficient, and not just from an environmental perspective. Maintenance requires time and money, which people usually claim are in short supply. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ American Time Use Survey, the average father of school-aged kids spends 1.6 hours a week on lawn and garden care — more time than he spends on reading, talking, playing or doing educational activities with his kids combined.

Shaming away a trend

For all these reasons, there’s a growing backlash against suburban seas of green. “The perfect lawn is in peril,” reports Steinberg. Big chunks of Canada have banned certain lawn pesticides. In the U.S., municipalities such as Los Angeles and Raleigh, N.C., regulate how many times a week homeowners can turn on the sprinklers.

That said, while rationing water during droughts has merit, I don’t think policymakers should start regulating lawns broadly. Deploying inspectors to count the square footage of grass vs. wild plants is a waste of resources when states are cutting teachers and cops. The best approach is for all of us to start thinking of lawns as a fashion — a fashion like wearing the feathers of rare birds in hats was once a fashion. Fashions can change when enough people decide they are ridiculous or wasteful. Few parents would light a cigarette at a playground anymore, even if it’s not illegal, and we should start treating the presence of a vast, green, cropped grass lawn in the middle of summer the same way: as a weird and antisocial thing.

Certainly, there are options.

“You don’t have to trade off the lawn for some hideous alternative,” notes Penny Lewis, executive director of the Ecological Landscaping Association. First, ask “how much lawn do you have and how much do you really need?”

Some homeowners keep a small patch of grass around the house and turn parts of the lawn into a meadow that attracts birds and butterflies. Others simply swear off pesticides and let the grass go dormant in the summer.

Faulkner, on the other hand, went all-in. She redid her lawn with rocks and hearty plants such as Confederate Jasmine, arranged to look like an English garden. Because all her plants grow well in Florida, they require no upkeep. “I don’t have to mow, I don’t have to water, I don’t have to trim,” she reports. Her water bill has gone from $80-$90/month to $20.

Her only lawn headache now? Figuring out what to do with the time and money she’s saving — a problem let’s hope more homeowners have soon.

Laura Vanderkam, author of 168 Hours: You Have More Time Than You Think, is a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributors.

70 Things To Do Before Having Kids… Really?

Monday, August 16th, 2010

I’m newly back from vacation, and as I ricochet around various social media sites, I came across one recommendation to a site called Marc and Angel Hack Life. Among the articles this couple offers is “70 Things To Do Before Having Kids.” (It’s from about two years back – but was among the top links).

The main idea is sound — namely, that children add a certain complexity to life. And so, Marc and Angel listed 70 goals they wanted to accomplish before having kids.

But whether they have children now or not (and I generally think it’s a great blog), I hope they eventually realize this: people tend to turn children and life into a false choice. In particular, as a new mom, I was alarmed by all the literature claiming it was just so hard to build a career and raise a family at the same time. Yet I never would have written 168 Hours if I hadn’t had Jasper, and now this book is opening new doors to me. Which means that — by the transitive property — my baby opened professional doors for me, rather than closing them. I had more free time before I had children, and yet I never ran a marathon then. I ran my first one this year.

So it’s interesting to me that publishing a book and running a marathon both landed on the 70 Things list. So, incidentally, did going to Munich (I took my toddler along!), living in a high rise condo with an amazing view, perhaps in the heart of New York City (here I am!), and traveling in back roads in a developing country to see what poverty really looks like (I’ve walked through slums in India and Peru since becoming a mom – which I think is more intense than driving in them). I’ve even read 30 books in the last 3 years. Many of the others (like jumping out of an airplane or learning to fly one) have never been on my bucket list and never will be. Kids or not.

The point is, life does not have to end when you have children. Even longer-term, ambitious and personal pursuits do not have to end. You may have to plan more, but planning is a great way to ensure that things get done.

The Giving Pledge

Monday, August 16th, 2010

I’ve been reading a lot lately about the Giving Pledge — Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet’s campaign to get other billionaires to pledge at least half their fortunes to charity.

I am of two minds on this. On one hand, I think people can spend their money however they want, and there is a lot of innovative work going on in philanthropy right now. The Gates Foundation is transforming the playing field in global health and vaccines, and hopefully someday will do so more effectively in education than the misguided small schools initiative the foundation had been championing. The Broad Foundation is also doing good work in education.

But I wish we could broaden the definition of charity a bit. You don’t have to be giving money away with no possibility of financial return to be doing good for the world. Indeed, you might do plenty of good by aiming to get a return. I’ve always loved the adage that the best social program is a job. The non-profits these billionaires are pledging to fund create jobs, but so do for-profit companies. When billionaires invest or loan money to start-ups, they are creating jobs. New companies are responsible for the majority of job creation in the American economy. As people land these new jobs, they spend their paychecks on housing and furniture and cars and clothes and gadgets and everything else, thus stimulating demand, which in turn leads to more companies employing more people.

In other words, such investing creates benefits for society. Of course, it tends to also create benefits for the investor, but so what? Perhaps there could be some sort of hybrid of the two, with charity-minded wealthy investors putting money into slightly riskier ventures than they otherwise might, or showing a bias toward ventures that employ more people rather than fewer. But just because something is called “charity” doesn’t mean it’s inherently more worthy than the other activities people do. There are many ways to give back.